<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Commenti a: Privacy? - Appunti dal NSS07 #1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://viklog.net/2007/11/30/privacy-appunti-dal-nss07-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://viklog.net/2007/11/30/privacy-appunti-dal-nss07-1/</link>
	<description>il (b)log da bere tutto in un sorso</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Di: evil bit - Appunti dal NSS07 #2 &#171; viklog</title>
		<link>http://viklog.net/2007/11/30/privacy-appunti-dal-nss07-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>evil bit - Appunti dal NSS07 #2 &#171; viklog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dividebyzero.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/privacy-appunti-dal-nss07-1/#comment-238</guid>
		<description>[...] Sempre dall&#8217;incotro di Marco Misitano è emerso uno spunto divertente: RFC 3514 - The Security Flag in the IPv4 Header. In questo RFC viene introdotto un flag da inserire nell&#8217;header dell&#8217;IPv4 denominato evil bit. Firewalls [CBR03], packet filters, intrusion detection systems, and the like often have difficulty distinguishing between packets that have malicious intent and those that are merely unusual. The problem is that making such determinations is hard. To solve this problem, we define a security flag, known as the &#8220;evil&#8221; bit, in the IPv4 [RFC791] header. Benign packets have this bit set to 0; those that are used for an attack will have the bit set to 1. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sempre dall&#8217;incotro di Marco Misitano è emerso uno spunto divertente: RFC 3514 - The Security Flag in the IPv4 Header. In questo RFC viene introdotto un flag da inserire nell&#8217;header dell&#8217;IPv4 denominato evil bit. Firewalls [CBR03], packet filters, intrusion detection systems, and the like often have difficulty distinguishing between packets that have malicious intent and those that are merely unusual. The problem is that making such determinations is hard. To solve this problem, we define a security flag, known as the &#8220;evil&#8221; bit, in the IPv4 [RFC791] header. Benign packets have this bit set to 0; those that are used for an attack will have the bit set to 1. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Di: vik</title>
		<link>http://viklog.net/2007/11/30/privacy-appunti-dal-nss07-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>vik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dividebyzero.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/privacy-appunti-dal-nss07-1/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Eh già! Purtroppo c'è poco da scherzare, anche se il video è un po' esagerato.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh già! Purtroppo c&#8217;è poco da scherzare, anche se il video è un po&#8217; esagerato.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Di: DnaX</title>
		<link>http://viklog.net/2007/11/30/privacy-appunti-dal-nss07-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>DnaX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dividebyzero.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/privacy-appunti-dal-nss07-1/#comment-236</guid>
		<description>C'ero anche io, veramente impressionante!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;ero anche io, veramente impressionante!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
